Comparative of Some Biofunctool Toolkits and Laboratory Soil Analysis Method to Assess Soil Quality in Different Soil Textures

Authors

  • Phantip Panklang 1 Division of Land Use Planning and Policy, Land Development Department, Bangkok, 10900
  • Alexis Thoumazeau 2 CIRAD, UPR Systèmes de Pérennes, Montpellier, France
  • Alain Brauman 3 IRD, UMR ECO&SOLS, Montpellier, France

Keywords:

Pepper, Soil texture, Soil health, Soil quality index

Abstract

The “Biofunctool” toolkit dedicated to the onsite measurement of soil health was collected and developed under the collaboration between the Land Development Department (LDD) and the French research institute: IRD and CIRAD. This tool aimed to assess the impact of agricultural practices on soil functioning and quality. However, soil quality varies according to the soil texture and constitutes one potential limitation affecting soil quality assessment. This study was undertaken on 4 different types of soil texture; loam, sandy loam, clay loam and sandy clay loam all located within the same type of plantations (pepper). All the measurements were done in Kaeng Hang Maeo district, Chantaburi province (3 plantations per soil texture with 3 replications per plantation). Soil quality was analyzed by some fast and inexpensive Biofunctool toolkit, and compared with the laboratory method. The results indicated that the soil health assessment by laboratory method and the Biofunctool follow the same trend. Loamy soil had the highest soil health index than others, followed by sandy loam, clay loam, and sandy clay loam, respectively. There was no significant difference between the soil quality index originated from both laboratory method and the Biofunctool. It showed that the Biofunctool could be used to assess soil health in conjunction with laboratory method. Alternatively, the Biofunctool could be used to perform a preliminary soil quality assessment to reduce costs and time. In particular, the study on soil organism activities done by Bait lamina and SituResp method indicated also that the Biofunctool was able to assess the significant impact of organic matter.

References

Amooh, M.K. and Bonsu, M. 2015. Effects of soil texture and organic matter on evaporative loss of soil moisture. Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology 3: 152-161.

Andersson, S. and Nilsson, S.I. 2001. Influence of pH and temperature on microbial activity, substrate availability of soil-solution bacteria and leaching of dissolved organic carbon in a mor humus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33: 1181-1191.

Back, G.R., and K.H. Hartge. 1986. Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1. (ed. A. Klute), pp. 363-375. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.

Brauman, A., Simon, C., Panklang, P., Kouakou, A., Peerawat, M., Suvannang, N., Kolo, Y., Konate, S., Lefevre, C. and Thoumazeau, A. 2021. Biofunctool, a multifunctional approach of soil health related to soil biota activities. Proceedings of Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity, Rome, Italy, 19-22 April 2021, pp. 224-231.

Carter, M.R. 1990. Relative measures of soil bulk density to characterize compaction in tillage studies on fine sandy loams. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 70: 425-433.

Colter, H. and Ortega-Larrocea, M.P. 2006. Effect of land use on soil erosion in tropical dry forest ecosystem, Chamela watershed, Mexico. Catena 65: 107-117.

Herrick, J.E., Whitford, W.G., Soyza, A.G., Zee, J.W.V., Havstad, K.M., Seybold, C.A. and Walton, M. 2001. Field soil aggregate stability kit for soil quality and rangeland health evaluations. Catena 44: 27–35.

Hook, P.B. and Burke, I.C. 2000. Biogeochemistry in a shortgrass landscape: control by topography, soil texture, and microclimate. Ecology 81: 2686-2703.

Jiao, S., Chen, W., Wang, J., Du, N., Li Q. and Wei, G. 2018. Soil microbiomes with distinct assemblies through vertical soil profiles drive the cycling of multiple nutrients in reforested ecosystems. Microbiome 6: 1-13.

Khunkrai, A. 2018. Effects of land patterns and topography on some important physical and chemical properties of soils in Thung Yai watershed, Songkhla province. Master’s thesis. Prince of Songkla University.

Kome, G.K., Enang, R.K., Tabi F.O. and Yerima, B.P.K. 2019. Influence of clay minerals on some soil fertility attributes: A review. Open Journal of Soil Science 9: 155-188.

Land Development Department. 2010. Work manual: Soil physical properties analysis. Bangkok: Land Development Department.

Lassabatère, L., Angulo-jaramillo, R., Soria Ugalde, J.M., Cuenca, R., Braud, I. and Haverkamp, R. 2006. Beerkan estimation of soil transfer parameters through Infiltration experiments-BEST. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 70: 521–532.

Moh, T.W.H. 2017. Pepper statistical yearbook 2016. Jakarta: International Pepper Community.

Obriot, F., Stauffer, M., Goubard, Y., Cheviron, N., Peres, G., Eden, M., Revallier, A., Vieuble-Gonod, L. and Houot, S. 2016. Multi-criteria indices to evaluate the effects of repeated organic amendent applications on soil and crop quality. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment. 232: 165-178.

Office of Science for Land Development. 2004. A guide for soil, water, fertilizer, plants and soil amendments analysis and the analysis for product certification. Bangkok: Land Development Department.

Padekar, D.G., Mokhale S.U., Gawande S.N. and Peshattiwar P.D. 2018. Soil quality concepts and assessment. An Asian Journal of Soil Science 13: 80-86.

Peech, M. 1965. Hydrogen Ion Activity. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. (ed. C.A. Black), pp. 914-926. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.

Reitsma, K.D., Schumacher, T.E. and Clay, D.E. 2011. Soil Quality. In Alternative Practices for Agronomic Nutrient and Pest Management in South Dakota (ed. D. Deneke), pp. 1-8. South Dakota: South Dakota State University.

Somsu, B., Kongyarit, A. and Suwannapetch, R. 2022. Physical and chemical quality analysis in rice paddy soil from Singhanakhon district, Songkhla province. Proceedings of the 7th National Science and Technology Conference: NSCIC 2022, Suratthani Rajabhat University, Suratthani, 10-11 March 2022, pp. 552-558.

Thoumazeau, A., Gay, F., Alonso, P., Suvannang, N., Phongjinda, A., Panklang, P., Chevallier, T., Bessou, C., Brauman, A. 2017. SituResp: A time- and cost-effective method to assess basal soil respiration in the field. Applied Soil Ecology 121: 223–230.

United States Department of Agriculture. 2001. Guidelines for soil quality assessment in conservation planning. Available from: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/nrcs142p2_050963.pdf. [accessed on 9 March 2024].

Van Gestel, C.A.M., Kruidenier, M. and Berg, M.P. 2003. Suitability of wheat straw decomposition, cotton strip degradation and bait-lamina feeding tests to determine soil invertebrate activity. Biology and Fertility of Soils 37: 115–123.

Walkley, A., and Black, A. 1934. An examination of the Degiareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29-28.

Zheng, K., Cheng, J., Xia, J. and Liu, G. 2021. Effects of soil bulk density and moisture content on the physico-mechanical properties of paddy soil in plough layer. Water 13: DOI:10.3390/w13162290.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-29

How to Cite

Panklang, P., Thoumazeau, A. ., & Brauman, A. . (2024). Comparative of Some Biofunctool Toolkits and Laboratory Soil Analysis Method to Assess Soil Quality in Different Soil Textures. Songklanakarin Journal of Plant Science, 11(2), xx-xx. Retrieved from https://www.sjplantscience.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/112

Issue

Section

08-Soil Management & Plant Nutrients